#NODEBOX SCRIPTS CODE#

the build repository is a shared repository for holding code that is used across multiple repos in the build system. It's causing a lot of confusion among developers who think there might be a problem with their builds as a result of the warning. I'm looking for any ideas on what might be causing this or how I might be able to further troubleshoot it given the complete lack of detail that the error/warning provides. I currently have YAML triggers overridden for the pipeline, but I did also define the same trigger in the YAML to see if that would help (it did not). Nothing is broken and no further details are given about the supposed issue. The odd part here is that the pipeline works completely fine, including triggers. The pipelines run perfectly fine, however I get a 'Some recent issues detected related to pipeline trigger.' warning at the top of the pipeline summary page and viewing details only states: 'Configuring the trigger failed, edit and save the pipeline again.' I have run in to an odd problem after converting a bunch of my YAML pipelines to use templates for holding job logic as well as for defining my pipeline variables. If you have an object created as type MostDerived: The most-derived object of d_obj is an object of type Derived. Again, complete is not synonymous with most-derived.Īlso if I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), Is the object d_obj is also a 'most-derived' object? This is not necessarily a complete object, however, since this could be a class member definition. The most-derived object of b_obj is an object of type Base.

So if I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), Is the object b_obj is 'most-derived' object? A most-derived object may be a subobject, so you cannot infer object completeness from most-derivedness (however, you can infer that the most-derived object is of class type).Every complete object of class-type is a most-derived object only if that class inherits.Objects may be of class type, but non-class type objects also exist. A most-derived object is an object of a most-derived class, and a most-derived class must be of a class type. Is every 'complete' object is 'most-derived' object If I have created an object of Derived like this: Derived d_obj = Derived(), is the object d_obj also a 'most-derived' object?ĭoes the word 'derived' in 'most-derived' mean that the object is an object of a class like MostDerived, or mean that the object has no class subobject in it? If I have created an object of Base like this: Base b_obj = Base(), is the object b_obj a 'most-derived' object? Per the question 'What does the 'most derived object' mean?' I think that (correct me if I am wrong), objects of type 'most-derived' class only, like MostDerived, are called 'most-derived' objects. I stopped here, I really do not understand the rest of the wording.

If a complete object, a member subobject, or an array element is of class type, its type is considered the most derived class An object of a most derived class type or of a non-class type is called a most derived object.įrom the quote what I understand is that a type of a complete object is of 'most-derived' class type. I can't understand the wording in this quote from the standard:

Nodebox scripts